Comprehensive Security Analysis of "https://scanigma.com" - Overall Grade is "C"

weak

Protocol

https

Domain

scanigma.com

Checked IP

143.244.197.110

Check Time

2025-07-05T23:19:07+02:00

Cache Time

2025-07-05T15:54:26+00:00

Protocol HTTPS (TLS)

Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a secure data transfer protocol that creates secure communication to leverage higher privacy. Widely used on the Internet, it is the successor of the ancient SSL. Several versions of the protocol are used in applications and services, TLS 1.3 is the most recent, but TLS 1.2 is very common too. Many protocols rely on TLS, for instance, the HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) is a security layer over the unencrypted HTTP, but several e-mail protocols (eg: IMAPS, SMTPS, POP3S) use as well to get a secure connection.

▼

Cipher suites

▼

Highlighted findings

0 total protocol related checks

Congratulations! We could not find any potential issues regarding your server configuration.

▶

Checked facts

15 total protocol related checks

Good Authenticated Encryption (not authenticated encryption)

Encryption mode is not an authenticated encryption^[74] which could provide confidentiality^[91]^[92]^[93], integrity, and authenticity assurances on the data.

Prefer cipher suites with authenticated encryption (AE) attribute.

A+

Excellent Block Cipher Mode of Operation (GCM)

block cipher mode of operation^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]^[86] Galois/Counter Mode^[46]^[47]^[48]^[49] is considered secure. It provides authenticated encryption^[74] which simultaneously assure the confidentiality^[91]^[92]^[93] and authenticity^[75]^[76]^[77] of data.

If your application or requirements specifically call for the use of a message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] that does not provide authenticated encryption^[74] prefer block cipher mode of operation^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]^[86] (eg: counter with CBC-MAC^[32]^[33]^[34], Galois/Counter Mode^[46]^[47]^[48]^[49] or message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] (eg: Poly1305^[458]^[459]) that proved authenticated encryption over the ones which does not provide it.

A+

Excellent Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)

Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm^[266]^[267]^[268]^[269] is the elliptic-curve cryptography^[118]^[119]^[120]^[121] based variant of the digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110] names Digital Signature Algorithm^[258]^[259]^[260]^[261]^[262]^[263] algorithm. It is considered secure ^[270]^[271] and gives better performance and smaller key sizes.

A+

Excellent Digital Signature Algorithm (RSA)

Rivest–Shamir–Adleman^[275]^[276]^[277] is a digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110] algorithm, which is considered secure, however there are known weaknesses^[278]^[279]^[280]^[281]^[282].

A+

Excellent Encryption Algorithm (AES)

Encryption algorithm Advanced Encryption Standard^[302]^[303]^[304]^[305]^[306]^[307]^[308]^[309] is a block cipher^[78]^[79]^[80]^[81] for which there is no known practical attack that would allow the attacker to recover the encrypted text without knowledge of the key when the algorithm is implemented correctly. However improper implementations may lead to a side-channel attack^[69]^[70]^[71] as it has happened in case of OpenSSL^[395]^[396] ^[310]^[311]^[312].

Prefer cipher suites with greater key size of AES (eg: perfer AES-256 over AES-128).

A+

Excellent Encryption Algorithm (ChaCha20)

The stream cipher^[182]^[183] ChaCha20^[324]^[325]^[326]^[327] is a variant of the algorithm Salsa20^[380]^[381]^[382] is considered secure ^[331]^[332] and gives better performance for mobile devices.

Prefer stream cipher^[182]^[183] ChaCha20^[324]^[325]^[326]^[327] in case of mobile devices.

A+

Excellent Encryption Block Size (encryption block size > 64 bits)

The block cipher^[78]^[79]^[80]^[81] uses a block size^[87] larger than 64 bits, so it is not vulnerable to sweet32 attack^[22]^[23]^[24]^[25].

A+

Excellent Encryption Block Size (encryption key size ≥ 128 bits)

The symmetric key^[185]^[186]^[187] withkey size^[184] more than 128 bits as it is should be according to National Institute of Standards and Technology^[470]^[471] so it is not vulnerable to preimage attack^[67] and it cannreliably prove that message came from the stated sender (its authenticity) and has not been changed, so connection is not open for a man-in-the-middle attack^[61].

Remove the cipher suite from the list of cipher suites supported by your server.

A+

Excellent Authenticated Encryption (authenticated encryption)

Encryption mode is an authenticated encryption^[74] which provides confidentiality^[91]^[92]^[93], integrity, and authenticity assurances on the data.

A+

Excellent Key Exchange Algorithm (ECDHE)

Ephemeral Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman^[432]^[433] is a variant of Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman^[114]^[115] key exchange that has forward secrecy^[127]^[128]^[129]^[130], and does protect past sessions against future compromises. If long-term secret keys or passwords are compromised, encrypted communications and sessions recorded in the past cannot be retrieved and decrypted.

Always prefer cipher suites with PFS property over the non-PFS ones. Note that performance considerations implies preferring Ephemeral Elliptic-curve Diffie–Hellman^[432]^[433] over Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman^[405]^[406]^[407]^[408].

A+

Excellent Forward Secrecy (forward secret algorithm)

Key exchange method has forward secrecy^[127]^[128]^[129]^[130], and does protect past sessions against future compromises. If long-term secret keys or passwords are compromised, encrypted communications and sessions recorded in the past cannot be retrieved and decrypted.

Always prefer cipher suites with FS property over the non-FS ones.

A+

Excellent MAC Algorithm (Poly1305)

message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] is a message authentication code based on universal hashing^[150]^[151]^[152]^[153] which is considered secure. It provides authenticated encryption^[74] which simultaneously assure the confidentiality^[91]^[92]^[93] and authenticity^[75]^[76]^[77] of data. Together with stream cipher^[182]^[183] ChaCha20ChaCha20-Poly1305^[328]^[329]^[330] gives better performance on mobile devices under the same conditions of security.

If your application or requirements specifically call for the use of a message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] that does not provide authenticated encryption^[74] prefer block cipher mode of operation^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]^[86] (eg: counter with CBC-MAC^[32]^[33]^[34], Galois/Counter Mode^[46]^[47]^[48]^[49] or message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] (eg: Poly1305^[458]^[459]) that proved authenticated encryption over the ones which does not provide it. In case of a hashed message authentication code^[139]^[140]^[141]^[142]^[143]^[144]^[145] prefer message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] based on Secure Hash Algorithm 2^[212]^[213]^[214] over the ones based on Secure Hash Algorithm 1^[202]^[203]^[204].

A+

Excellent MAC Algorithm (SHA-2)

message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] is a hashed message authentication code^[139]^[140]^[141]^[142]^[143]^[144]^[145] which is considered secure. The underlaying cryptographic hash function^[94]^[95]^[96]^[97] (Secure Hash Algorithm 2^[212]^[213]^[214]) is also considered secure.

If your application or requirements specifically call for the use of a message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] that does not provide authenticated encryption^[74] prefer block cipher mode of operation^[82]^[83]^[84]^[85]^[86] (eg: counter with CBC-MAC^[32]^[33]^[34], Galois/Counter Mode^[46]^[47]^[48]^[49] or message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] (eg: Poly1305^[458]^[459]) that proved authenticated encryption over the ones which does not provide it. In case of a hashed message authentication code^[139]^[140]^[141]^[142]^[143]^[144]^[145] prefer message authentication code^[135]^[136]^[137]^[138] based on Secure Hash Algorithm 2^[212]^[213]^[214] over the ones based on Secure Hash Algorithm 1^[202]^[203]^[204].

A+

Excellent TLS Cipher Suite Preference (client cipher suites are preferred)

Server prefers client's cipher suite^[189]^[190] order over its own cipher suite preference order. It may cause that less secure cipher suite is choosen in case of an improperly configured client, only if server supports less secure cipher suites. However it allows the clients to choose their most preferred cipher suite, which may give them better performance (eg: ChaCha20/Poly1305 ChaCha20-Poly1305^[328]^[329]^[330]) on mobile devices under the same conditions of security.

Remove any intermediate or backward compatible cipher suite to make possible preferring client's cipher suite order without any security consideration.

A+

Excellent TLS Cipher Suite Preference (client cipher suites are preferred securely)

Server prefers client's cipher suite^[189]^[190] order over its own cipher suite preference order. As each cipher suite^[189]^[190] supported by the server is considered secure, this is the best configuration. It allows the clients to choose their most preferred cipher suite, which may give them better performance (eg: ChaCha20/Poly1305 ChaCha20-Poly1305^[328]^[329]^[330]) on mobile devices under the same conditions of security.

▶

Detailed info

TLS 1.2
Grade	Order	Cipher suite name	Findings
A+		TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
A+		TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
A+		TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
A+		TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
A+		TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256
A+		TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256

TLS 1.3
Grade	Order	Cipher suite name	Findings
A+		TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
A+		TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
A		TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256

▼

Key exchange

▼

Highlighted findings

0 total protocol related checks

Congratulations! We could not find any potential issues regarding your server configuration.

▶

Checked facts

4 total protocol related checks

Good Elliptic Curve Algorithm (elliptic curves designed by NIST)

The elliptic-curve cryptography^[118]^[119]^[120]^[121] is an approach to public-key cryptography^[164]^[165]^[166] based on the elliptic curve^[116]^[117]s. Note that there is controversy^[287]^[288]^[289]^[290]^[291] around some of the National Institute of Standards and Technology^[470]^[471] designed elliptic curveselliptic curves designed by NIST^[285]^[286].

Add at least one elliptic curve to the list of elliptic curves supported by your server designed by independent researchers and prefer them as server configuration makes it possible.

Good Elliptic Curve Algorithm (elliptic curves not post-quantum safe)

The elliptic curve^[116]^[117] is not secure against a cryptanalytic attack by a quantum computer.

Add at least one quantum-safe elliptic curve to the list of elliptic curves supported by your server and prefer them as server configuration makes it possible.

A+

Excellent Elliptic Curve Algorithm (elliptic curve designed by independent researcher)

Add at least one elliptic curve to the list of elliptic curves supported by your server designed by independent researchers and prefer them as server configuration makes it possible.

A+

Excellent Elliptic Curve Algorithm (elliptic curve key size)

The elliptic-curve cryptography^[118]^[119]^[120]^[121] is an approach to public-key cryptography^[164]^[165]^[166] based on the elliptic curve^[116]^[117]s. The most important property in terms of encryption strength, beyond the designer is elliptic curve key size^[292]^[293]^[294]. All the key sizes available are considered secure, so there is no consideration about it.

▶

Detailed info

Elliptic Curves
Grade	Name	Code	Key Size	Trusted Design	Post Quantum Safe
A	Curve25519	0x001D	256	Yes	No
A	Curve448	0x001E	448	Yes	No
A	secp521r1	0x0019	521	No	No
A	secp384r1	0x0018	384	No	No
A	prime256v1	0x0017	256	No	No

▼

Public keys

▼

Highlighted findings

1 total protocol related checks

Weak Public Key Revocation Check (OCSP stapling not supported)

Server does not support revocation check mechanism Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) stapling^[527]^[528]^[529]^[530]^[531]. Revocation check mechanisms of X.509 public key^[493]^[494]^[495]^[496]^[497] certificates have many flaws ^[518]^[519]^[520]^[521] and now, the only practically working and used vendor independent mechanisms is OCSP stapling.Without using a certificate revocation check mechanism a client applications (eg: browser, email client, ...), cannot determine whether X.509 public key the server provides still valid or it has already been revoked by the issuer of the certificate. Without this information it cannot be reliably proved that message caomes from the stated sender (its authenticity) or it has been changed, so connections could be open for a man-in-the-middle attack^[61].

Always chose certificate authority^[88]^[89]^[90]s which support Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP)^[522]^[523]^[524]^[525]^[526]. Prefer server implementations which support Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) stapling^[527]^[528]^[529]^[530]^[531] or use a proxy application make up for this shortcomings.

▶

Checked facts

12 total protocol related checks

Good X.509 Public Key Subject (common name does not match)

A digital certificate^[104]^[105] must contain a field called subject^[509]^[510] and may contain certificate extensions^[506]^[507]^[508] including subject alternative name extension^[502]^[503]^[504]. During the hostname validation^[514]^[515] client applications (eg: browser, email client, ...) match common name^[511]^[512]^[513] part of the subject and values of subject alternative names against the domain name^[112]^[113] of the connected server. Either the value of the common name attribute or one of the values of subject alternative name extension should match to the domain name exactly at least by a wildcard character^[191]^[192] in case of a wildcrard certificate^[551]^[552]^[553]^[554]. The certificate provided by your server contains common names, but neither of its values matches the domain name.

Ensure that one of the values of the subject alternative names extension of the certificate provided by your server matches to the domain name. Consider the fact that old client (eg: browsers released before 2003) may not support^[505] the subject alternative names extension.

Good X.509 Public Key Subject (subject alternative names do not match)

A digital certificate^[104]^[105] must contain a field called subject^[509]^[510] and may contain certificate extensions^[506]^[507]^[508] including subject alternative name extension^[502]^[503]^[504]. During the hostname validation^[514]^[515] client applications (eg: browser, email client, ...) match common name^[511]^[512]^[513] part of the subject and values of subject alternative names against the domain name^[112]^[113] of the connected server. Either the value of the common name attribute or one of the values of subject alternative name extension should match to the domain name exactly at least by a wildcard character^[191]^[192] in case of a wildcrard certificate^[551]^[552]^[553]^[554]. The certificate provided by your server contains subject alternative name extension, but neither of its values matches the domain name.

Ensure the common name part of the subject field of the certificate provided by your server matches to the domain name.

A+

Excellent Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)

A+

Excellent Digital Signature Algorithm (RSA)

Rivest–Shamir–Adleman^[275]^[276]^[277] is a digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110] algorithm, which is considered secure, however there are known weaknesses^[278]^[279]^[280]^[281]^[282].

A+

Excellent Public Key Size (ECDSA with key size ≥ 224)

The asymmetric key size^[53] in cryptography defines the upper-bound on an algorithm's security. The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm^[266]^[267]^[268]^[269] is a digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110]. The ECDSA keys with size greater than or equal to 224 bits are considered secure according to National Institute of Standards and Technology^[470]^[471].

A+

Excellent Public Key Size (RSA with key size ≤ 2048)

The asymmetric key size^[53] in cryptography defines the upper-bound on an algorithm's security. The Rivest–Shamir–Adleman cryptosystem^[478]^[479]^[480] is a cryptosystem, which provides both key distribution^[131], digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110]. The RSA keys with size greater than or equal to 2048 bits are considered secure according to National Institute of Standards and Technology^[470]^[471].

A+

Excellent X.509 Public Key Subject (common name does not match)

A+

Excellent Public Key Signature Hash Algorithm (root CA signature algorithm)

A digital certificate^[104]^[105] which identifies a site can be signed by a certificate authority^[88]^[89]^[90] or can be a self-signed certificate^[111] (root certificate^[106]) having a digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110] in both cases, however it is needless to be verified in the latter case, so the security of the used cryptographic hash function^[94]^[95]^[96]^[97] does not matter.

A+

Excellent X.509 Public Key Subject (subject alternative names do match)

A digital certificate^[104]^[105] must contain a field called subject^[509]^[510] and may contain certificate extensions^[506]^[507]^[508] including subject alternative name extension^[502]^[503]^[504]. During the hostname validation^[514]^[515] client applications (eg: browser, email client, ...) match common name^[511]^[512]^[513] part of the subject and values of subject alternative names against the domain name^[112]^[113] of the connected server. Either the value of the common name attribute or one of the values of subject alternative name extension should match to the domain name exactly at least by a wildcard character^[191]^[192] in case of a wildcrard certificate^[551]^[552]^[553]^[554]. The certificate provided by your server contains subject alternative name extension and one of its values matches the domain name.

A+

Excellent X.509 Public Key Validation (domain-validated certificate)

The digital certificate^[104]^[105] identifies the site is a domain-validated certificate^[536], means that verification of the control over a DNS domain was required by the certificate authority^[88]^[89]^[90] to sign this certificate.

Take into consideration the advantages of a domain-validated certificate^[536] (eg: completely automated certificate renewal^[516]^[517] process, possibly short validation period^[518]^[519]^[520]^[521]) over minor user experience improvement of an extended validation in certain client applications and the risk of a potential service outage caused by the manual certificate renewal^[541]^[542].

A+

Excellent X.509 Public Key Validity (certficate is valid)

A digital certificate^[104]^[105] identifies a site is signed by a certificate authority^[88]^[89]^[90] certifies the ownership of a public key within a limited time period, called validity^[543]^[544]^[545]. The current date and time is within the validity period of the public key provided by your server.

Restore the certificate, provided by your server, to the latest one, if it is available and its validity period has not ended yet, or initiate renewal^[516]^[517] process if its validity period has ended yet. If there no available certificate create a completely new one and get is signed with a certificate authority.

A+

Excellent Public Key Signature Hash Algorithm (SHA-2)

The digital certificate^[104]^[105] which identifies the site is signed by a certificate authority^[88]^[89]^[90] having digital signature^[107]^[108]^[109]^[110] with signature hash algorithm SHA-2^[565] which uses Secure Hash Algorithm 2^[212]^[213]^[214] as cryptographic hash function^[94]^[95]^[96]^[97] considered secure.

Always provide certificate by your server to use signature algorithms with hash functions that are strong just like SHA-2 signature algorithms.

▶

Detailed info

A+

Server Certificate

scanigma.com

+0 alternative name(s)

Valid From: 2025-07-05T09:12:52+00:00

Valid Until: 2025-10-03T09:12:51+00:00

A+

Intermediate CA

R10

2024-03-13

2027-03-13

A+

Root CA

ISRG Root X1

2015-06-04

2035-06-04

A+

Subject Info

Common Names

scanigma.com

Subject Alternative Names

scanigma.com

A+

Validity

Not Before

2025-07-05T09:12:52+00:00

Not After

2025-10-03T09:12:51+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

R10

Organization Name

Let's Encrypt

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

A9:03:0E:B6:BC:F6:E9:FE:6E:57:C5:87:D9:22:3B:60

SHA1

3D:1B:6C:BF:4B:B8:C2:6B:53:95:CD:BB:5E:2C:2A:96:8D:4E:2C:BB

SHA2_256

16:C3:DF:3A:48:C5:87:9E:C0:B7:9A:66:EC:4C:5C:57:D9:CE:8F:7C:08:89:4F:13:04:FE:17:91:1E:95:31:33

A+

Public Key

Key Type

RSA

Key Size

3072

A+

Subject Info

Common Name

R10

Organization Name

Let's Encrypt

Country Name

A+

Validity

Not Before

2024-03-13T00:00:00+00:00

Not After

2027-03-12T23:59:59+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

AF:1C:77:AE:CC:8D:77:E9:AA:CB:0C:47:58:40:C3:92

SHA1

00:AB:EF:D0:55:F9:A9:C7:84:FF:DE:AB:D1:DC:DD:8F:ED:74:14:36

SHA2_256

9D:7C:3F:1A:A6:AD:2B:2E:C0:D5:CF:1E:24:6F:8D:9A:E6:CB:C9:FD:07:55:AD:37:BB:97:4B:1F:2F:B6:03:F3

A+

Public Key

Key Type

RSA

Key Size

2048

A+

Subject Info

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Validity

Not Before

2015-06-04T11:04:38+00:00

Not After

2035-06-04T11:04:38+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

0C:D2:F9:E0:DA:17:73:E9:ED:86:4D:A5:E3:70:E7:4E

SHA1

CA:BD:2A:79:A1:07:6A:31:F2:1D:25:36:35:CB:03:9D:43:29:A5:E8

SHA2_256

96:BC:EC:06:26:49:76:F3:74:60:77:9A:CF:28:C5:A7:CF:E8:A3:C0:AA:E1:1A:8F:FC:EE:05:C0:BD:DF:08:C6

A+

Public Key

Key Type

RSA

Key Size

4096

Server Certificate

scanigma.com

+0 alternative name(s)

Valid From: 2025-07-05T09:13:02+00:00

Valid Until: 2025-10-03T09:13:01+00:00

A+

Intermediate CA

2024-03-13

2027-03-13

A+

Root CA

ISRG Root X1

2015-06-04

2035-06-04

Subject Info

Common Names

scanigma.com

Subject Alternative Names

scanigma.com

A+

Validity

Not Before

2025-07-05T09:13:02+00:00

Not After

2025-10-03T09:13:01+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

Organization Name

Let's Encrypt

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

7C:30:9C:9B:8C:46:53:45:2F:EB:C6:25:66:02:86:8D

SHA1

51:44:CE:A0:41:12:CE:27:53:EB:E5:89:4F:2A:B2:1C:0C:E8:B2:4A

SHA2_256

01:BD:3C:12:76:68:99:73:E1:EF:E5:BB:93:AB:39:03:43:45:4A:4A:12:24:C2:38:87:37:D8:F2:EE:96:DE:B9

A+

Public Key

Key Type

ECDSA

Key Size

256

A+

Subject Info

Common Name

Organization Name

Let's Encrypt

Country Name

A+

Validity

Not Before

2024-03-13T00:00:00+00:00

Not After

2027-03-12T23:59:59+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

26:86:4C:28:A4:DE:37:F5:69:C1:EC:87:A0:EC:CB:27

SHA1

C9:4D:C4:83:1A:90:1A:9F:EC:0F:B4:9B:71:BD:49:B5:AA:D4:FA:D0

SHA2_256

76:E9:E2:88:AA:FC:0E:37:F4:39:0C:BF:94:6A:AD:99:7D:5C:1C:90:1B:3C:E5:13:D3:D8:FA:DB:AB:E2:AB:85

A+

Public Key

Key Type

ECDSA

Key Size

384

A+

Subject Info

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Validity

Not Before

2015-06-04T11:04:38+00:00

Not After

2035-06-04T11:04:38+00:00

N/A

Issuer

Common Name

ISRG Root X1

Organization Name

Internet Security Research Group

Country Name

A+

Fingerprints

MD5

0C:D2:F9:E0:DA:17:73:E9:ED:86:4D:A5:E3:70:E7:4E

SHA1

CA:BD:2A:79:A1:07:6A:31:F2:1D:25:36:35:CB:03:9D:43:29:A5:E8

SHA2_256

96:BC:EC:06:26:49:76:F3:74:60:77:9A:CF:28:C5:A7:CF:E8:A3:C0:AA:E1:1A:8F:FC:EE:05:C0:BD:DF:08:C6

A+

Public Key

Key Type

RSA

Key Size

4096

▼

Versions

A+

▼

Highlighted findings

0 total protocol related checks

Congratulations! We could not find any potential issues regarding your server configuration.

▶

Checked facts

2 total protocol related checks

▶

Detailed info

Grade	Enabled Protocol	Findings
A+	TLS 1.3
A+	TLS 1.2